Friday, February 17, 2017

Who Should Govern the School? By Alfiatunnur M.Ed



Who Should Govern the School?
Alfiatunnur M.Ed
 Who Should Govern Our Schools?
 School is a formal agency of education, and it should reflect the culture and the need of the society, deliver knowledge, and build each individual for the future country improvement. Even though the school is only expected to focus on the teaching-learning process, school control is mostly influenced by power and politics.  In the countries, where multiple cultures and diverse population exist, the battle over school’s governance is a big issue.  Basically, it is normal because school is a long life institution, and for some reason, perhaps, school can be the resource to earn money and gain popularity. According to Sydney Hook “ the social and political problems of our age cannot be wished or prayed out of the world” (1973, p.300). So, if I am asked who should govern our school? I would definitely answer that it should be the region (sub district) government.
The battle over the school’s governance is often the result of political interest, which tries to obtain the power over the community. However, it absolutely will not benefit the educational realm.  Then, why should the region or sub district govern the school? It was a hot topic in the educational realm in Aceh, Indonesia.  Aceh is the western part of Indonesia, where the majority of the population is Muslim. Historically, Aceh was an independent Islamic kingdom before integrating into Indonesia. The integration process was followed by an agreement with the central government, which awarded Aceh as one of two special provinces in Indonesia.  As a special province, Aceh was given an opportunity to govern the state based on three special recognitions, which were religion, culture and education.
Unfortunately, the centralization government system, where all the power of control was from central government, had impeded the Aceh province development. It has caused a tremendous problem within the society in Aceh, which increase poverty, conflict and unresolved problems in the educational realm.  The 32 year conflict, which eventually ended peacefully after the tsunami struck Aceh, was not a mere political reaction, but it was the result of unequal income distribution between central government and Aceh government, and the three special recognitions of Aceh did not function optimally. 
Aceh is one of the richest provinces in Indonesia with natural resources, oil and gas, which make a huge income contribution.  Unfortunately, most of the income went to the central government, and only a small portion of income was left in Aceh. In addition, the centralize government system did not give enough opportunity for the Aceh government to optimally apply the three special recognitions of Aceh in the governing system, community and school in Aceh, until the peace agreement was signed and special autonomy then awarded.
Special autonomy was first awarded to the Aceh province in 2001. It offers a broad opportunity for the local government to regulate the system in Aceh. The local government regulation, which is called Canuun, has fully given an opportunity for the Aceh community to apply the three special recognitions for the community improvement. In addition, the most important provision of law is Aceh will receive 70 percent of oil and gas redistribution revenue. The most part of this 70 percent return income goes to support education.
The special autonomy is the sign of the beginning of a new decentralization era, where the provincial government has the authority to regulate the system. The Aceh local government begins to draft every single system of which is covered by the three Aceh special recognitions. It is totally valuable for the educational realm in Aceh. Compared to the centralization government system, it is completely different. Today, the schools have an equal access, and it has widely opened the opportunity for the school to make   improvements.
Learning from experience, I would say that if the local region or sub district governs the school, it will definitely help to develop the school, because:
School Improvement Should be Parallel with Community Development
            Though the system is not centered on the community, the importance of community involvement is still crucial. The community can devote their professional development resource to support an improvement at school level. School professional development should be developed based on the need of both school and community. It indicates that both of them cannot be separated and must work together to achieve the goal.
I myself witnessed, the past centralization government system in Indonesia, had brought negative impact on the educational realm in Aceh. As one of provinces in Indonesia, which is divided into four municipalities and at least ten regencies, are living in a very diverse community. Each group communities need a very diverse skill and knowledge with different approach system to develop their areas. However, the centralization government system had only emerged one idea of improvement, and it had to go with the central government decision.
The offer of special autonomy from the central government has widely opened a gate for the education realm in Aceh.  It is a great opportunity for the regional government to explore the local human resources, natural resources, culture, and religion to develop the school curriculum. Each region also has an authority to hire the teachers, school administration and principals from the local human resources, so they will stay at school forever or at least for a certain time. It has reduced the uncertainty of the school future. Sidney Hook in his book Education and the Taming of Power said “ it is one thing to plan a curriculum of studies with an awareness of the social trends and problems that are shaping the future and that are certain to affect the lives of generation to come” (1973, p.149).
The Regional Government knows what the school’s needs and the community’s expectation
            Another benefit of having the region govern the school is they know what the school needs and also the community’s expectation. Each place has different needs, and to be able to see the needs, they have to be involved in the community. For example, four years ago, the region of North Aceh needed more than a thousand nurses. To secure the health jobs, the region recruited many nurses.
After tsunami struck Aceh, the government had to replace four thousand teachers who died or lost due to the disaster, and each regions had the different number of needs. During an emergency phase, the teachers’ recruitment process was held by the central government. It had impact an unequal teachers distribution. Some schools needed more teachers, but they got less, or they got double for the same course, while others got none.
I am not going to say that the recruitment process at the regional level will be more effective, but at least it can be more efficient and reduce the probability of unequal teachers distribution.
Sustainable System
            Sustainable and effective management system is needed to secure the further school improvement. System designates some kind of thought and structure. During reconstruction phase in Aceh, many non - government organization (NGO) rebuilt the building in Aceh. Some of them were school building. It was much easier for the NGO to fund for building construction, however, thing got change when they begin discussing for a sustainable maintenance. As the funders, of course, they wanted to know who are going to fund the further operational cost, school building and facilities maintenance. The debate ended up with a solid decision, which goes to the regional government, where the buildings are being constructed.  
Secure Financially
            Since the regional government is only accountable for the school in their areas, they can optimally and wisely allocate funds to support the school operational cost. Financial security should be other main factor of keeping the school under regional government. Good financial support leads to an affective school improvement. Although this perhaps the simplest school activity, it will cost money.

Reference
Hook, S. (1973). Education and the taming power. Illinois: Open Court Publishing
Company





Saturday, October 15, 2016

The Struggle Over The School - Alfiatunnur M.Ed



The Struggle Over School Desegregation
Alfiatunnur M.Ed

 The Struggle Over the School Desegregation
            School is the major player in the process of education, which is expected to take over the responsibilities for the ethical, physical, and emotional development of children.  Unfortunately, the school environment is often unfriendly for the children to growth.  In the United States, school segregation issue has been widespread since a long time ago.  The Committee on Social Issue in the book Psychiatric Aspect of School Desegregation explained “the existence of segregation as an unsolved conflict leads to a chronic state of tension”(1957, p.12).  After reading the article and book, I can interpret that school segregation is not a mere social problem, but rigid stereotype, lower cultural status, economy and education as compared to white people lead to violent outbreak of racial tension are the root of the problem. 
            In 1954, the Supreme Court declared, “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal” (Eaton & Rivkin, 2010, p.1).  In 1970s, the Urban Education Reform was working to ensure that black students had opportunity to attend the school with their white peers (Eaton & Rivkin, 2010). The Committee on Social Issue said, “ Segregation can affect the levels of aspiration, the capacity to learn, and the capacity to relate in interpersonal situations, because of the rejection of one’s own group” (The committee on the social issue, 1957, p.10).
            The segregation issue has developed to the present days, however, I do not think that Busing program to promote school desegregation, where the minority students are transported to large white school, and white students are brought to largely minority school is the solution to create diversity and provide equal opportunity in public education.  Learning from experience, this program can affect the next phase of students’ psychological issue. For example, the students feel uncomfortable when they have to travel, and another possible problem is shock culture.
              Persuasive approaches are needed to end the segregation hierarchy at the school for the educational realm movement:
Policy Strengthened
            Though the school segregation has been declared illegal in the United States,
the doctrine of the white people over the school regulation is extended and dominates the education realm unconsciously. It is important for the policy makers to strengthen the educational policy at state and school level to help the minority acquire an equal educational opportunity.  The today’s movement is at hand of the policy maker, by putting a good foundation on the school regulation, it is expected that all the school structure will support this movement. 
Building Character in Students
            Developing the character in students is important, which include shaping their mind-set, help the students to have an open-minded thinking, develop a sense of community and how to appreciate others who differ from them.  It is such a persuasive and educative way in dealing with human being.  I have never advocated any physical movement in dealing with social problem.  I believe that every one has the right to live their own life, and the students have to learn how to appreciate others’ choices. And the most important thing is students’ self - conscious is needed to make them aware of what they want to do and achieve for their future. It will help them in deciding which school is the best to sharp their skills, not attending the school for prestigious only or looking for the most popular school.
Staff and Teacher Qualification
            School principal, staff and teachers are the people who are going to deal with the students’ daily activities.  As the main operator for the central object at the school, it is not surprising if their qualification is in high demand.  Ideally, all the school elements must be qualified to deal with the challenges and bring a good environment for the students to learn and growth.  In this case, school can be seen as the learning system for the principal, staff and teachers to gain more knowledge about human being and how to deal with them. Richard A. Swanson and Elwood F. Holton describe six learning theories in the book Foundations of Human Resources Development, which are humanism, social learning, constructivism, holistic learning, behaviorism, and cognitivism (2009, p.194).
 As the educator, the Humanism theory will help them to integrate with the students and gain more understanding how to socialize with the diverse students.  Swanson and Holton claimed that Humanism is not a mere learning theory, but rather as a general approach to psychology (2009, p.119).
Scoring System
            The most effective way to have the diverse population at the school is by judging the student based on scoring system.  Indonesia is the country made of multi cultural community, languages, religion and socio economic. Poverty is the biggest challenge for the government. I have to admit that we really struggle over the poor educational system. Yet, this poor condition has challenged the students to compete for a better opportunity.  Basically, the children are required to attend the closest school to them, but for those who can make good scores, they can have an opportunity to cross the border and attend neighborhood school. The local educational department will provide a recommendation letter to help those students.  I was one of the students and being so grateful, because of my good academic performance, brought me to move to another school in the town.
Classified the Students Based on Their Talents and Interest
            The school can gather students from the very diverse community by evaluating their talents and interest. Before enrolling the school, the students are required to take the test or walk through an interview to find out what they are interested in. It will automatically address the students to the school where they want to, and help the school desegregation naturally. This method can be used to select the students who are interested to enroll in Vocational School.
Student Exchange Program/ Sponsorship program
            This program will be very beneficial for the educational realm, not only for the school desegregation program, but also for the students cross culture understanding. It is a typical worldwide program, however, to help the students enhancing their understanding about the diversity, this program can be developed within the states.
Boarding School System
            Boarding school is another great option to store the diverse students at the schools.  This kind of school system will not only support the school desegregation, but it helps the students’ personality growth. Being apart of their families, they will have an opportunity to be more independent, engage in the diverse group and develop their perfectives over the diversity. I believe the more the children engage with the diverse group, the more they value others.


References
Eaton, S., & Rivkin, S. (2010). Is desegregation dead? Education Next. Retrieved
Swanson, R.A., & Holton III, E.F. (2009). Foundations of human resources
Development. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers,Inc.
The Committee on Social Issue. (1957). Psychiatric aspects of school desegregation.
Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry. New York: Group for the
Advancement of Psychiatry.

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

DRIVEN DECISION BASED ON DATA-By Nazliati


Driven Decision Based on Data
By Nazliati,M.Ed

            For the last two years, the overall performance of Leveret Elementary School shows a significant improvement; however, the school also records several weaknesses on the certain subgroup, which result in low scores.  The further school improvement program should be designed to support the lower’s score students and maintain those who have already had good scores.
 In medicine, diagnosis comes first before treatment; therefore, before making decision of what the school should focus on, a school data evaluation is strongly recommended. The present school performances are the crucial point for the further movement. It can be used to monitor the school progress and chart where the today’s school and where we are going to be. Too often, the principals address the improvement priority based on their own thoughts and skip the need of the students. To avoid this circumstance, the school should conduct an assessment, and the result will determine a turning point of the further school improvement plan. 
            Leverett Elementary School is a diverse and multiethnic school building. The objective of this school is to promote excellence by educating its diverse students population in a nurturing, challenging and disciplined environment. The school is committed to helping all students gain the necessary skills to become responsible citizens and life-long learners (ACSIP, 2009/10). 
            Having such a large diverse students group at school requires more skill in approaching them. In addition, if the school is required to offer a new approach for the next year of school improvement plan, the school should be able to clearly identify the present school situation. For example, the school should exactly know the percentage of the students score on standardize test, are they getting higher or lower during the past two years?
Multiple Data Resources
            Driven decision using multiple data resources will contribute an innovative thought and lead to the most effective future school improvement plan.
a.  The National Office for Research on Measurement and Evaluation Systems
(NORMES).
Figure 1. Literacy Performances in 2008/09 by Grade level and Demographic
School Demographics
Grades
Sub Population
Total
Tester
3
4
5


A
P
B
BB
A
P
B
BB
A
P
B
BB

Combined Population
35/36/37
45.7
28.6
17.1
8.6
30.6
27.8
33.3
8.3
48.6
16.2
24.3
10.8
46/40/39
60.9
17.4
17.4
4.3
30
35
25
10
17.9
51.3
25.6
5.1

African-American
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report

Hispanic
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report

Caucasian
21/25/22
47.6
23.8
14.3
14.3
40
32
24
4
54.5
13.6
18.2
13.6
29/24/26
55.2
20.7
20.7
3.4
25
37.5
20.8
16.7
26.9
50
19.2
3.8

Economic
Disadvantaged
26/22/23
34.6
30.8
23.1
11.5
36.4
13.6
40.9
9.1
34.8
13
34.8
17.4
29/30/25
51.7
20.7
24.1
3.4
23.3
33.3
30
13.3
12
52
28
8
Limited English Proficient
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
Students with Disabilities
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report

  Female
21/19/13
52.375
28.575
14.275
4.775
31.575
31.575
21.0
75
15.7
75
46.175
30.775
23.075
10.5
22/22/19
63.6
18.2
18.2
0
50
36.4
4.5
9.1
15.8
36.8
36.8
10.5

   Male
14/17/24
35.7
28.6
21.4
14.3
29.4
23.5
47.1
0
50
8.3
25
16.7
24/18/20
58.3
16.7
16.7
8.3
5.6
33.3
50
11.1
20
65
15
0

Figure 2: Mathematics Performances in 2008/09 by Grade level and Demographic
School Demographics
Grades
Sub Population
Total
Tester
3
4
5


A
P
B
BB
A
P
B
BB
A
P
B
BB

Combined Population
35/36/37
54.3
31.4
8.6
5.7
55.575
22.175
5.575
16.675
35.1
35.1
10.8
18.9
46/40/39
60.9
30.4
8.7
0
35
45
12.5
7.5
51.3
25.6
5.1
17.9

African-American
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report

Hispanic
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report

Caucasian
21/25/22
57.1
23.8
9.5
9.5
60
28
0
12
40.9
22.7
9.1
27.3
29/24/26
55.2
34.5
10.3
0
29.2
50
8.3
12.5
65.4
19.2
0
15.4

Economic
Disadvantaged
26/22/23
46.2
34.6
11.5
7.7
50
18.2
9.1
22.7
26.1
39.1
8.7
26.1
29/30/25
55.2
34.5
10.3
0
26.675
46.675
16.675
9.975
52
16
8
24
Limited English Proficient
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
Students with Disabilities
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report
<10
No Report
No Report
No Report

  Female
21/19/13
47.575
42.875
4.775
4.775
42.1
26.3
5.3

26.3
46.175
30.775
23.075
10.5
22/22/19
63.6
22.7
13.6
0
40.9
36.4
13.6
9.1
15.8
36.8
36.8
10.5
  Male
14/17/24
64.3
14.3
14.3
7.1
70.6
17.6
5.9
5.9
45.8
25
4.2
25
24/18/20
58.3
37.5
4.2
0
27.775
55.75
11.075
5.575
60
30
0
10
Mathematics and Literacy’s Percent Proficient Growth in 2008

Mathematics and Literacy’s Percent Proficient Growth in 2009

            Both above charts show that students make good scores for math (blue color) classes.  The data also show a significant improvement in the 2009.  During these two years, the overall literacy classes have not showed any significant improvement yet. It can be easily interpreted that the school needs to focus on Literacy classes for the school improvement plan.  As specified in 2009 data, two subgroups of Literacy classes --- Students with disabilities and African-American are the groups with the greatest need for attention and intervention.
b. Arkansas Comprehensive Improvement Plan (ACSIP)
1. Benchmark-3rd Grade literacy and Mathematics Exam
            In 2008 and 2009, the Combined Population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 68% and 97%, and the math scores were 81% and 91%. The Economically Disadvantaged population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 62% and 73%, and the math score were 75% and 90%. Meanwhile, the Caucasian sub population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 78% and 77%, and the math scores were 89% and 74%.
2. Benchmark-4th Literacy and Mathematic Exam
            In 2008 and 2009 school year, the combined population’s proficient advanced literacy score were 63% and 64%, and the math scores were 80% and 78%. In the same two years, the Economically Disadvantaged population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 58% and 56%, and the math score were 73% and 72%. The Caucasian population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were  74% and 63%, and the math scores were 89% and 74%.
3. Benchmark -5th Grade Literacy and Mathematics Exam
            In 2008-2009 school years, the Combined Population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 41% and 67%, and the math scores were 74% and 77%. The Economically Advantaged population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 18% and 61%, and the math scores were 69% and 68%. The Caucasian population’s proficient/advanced literacy scores were 43% and 74%, and the math scores were 67% and 85%.
            All subgroups are eligible for Safe Harbor based on the percent tested, attendance rate and proficiency change. The attendance goal of Leverett Elementary School was 91.13%, and the attendance rate in 200/09 was 94.8%.
Even though both data sources slightly show different on number, it is still valuable, because both of them explain the same meaning.  It can be interpreted that the students have problem with Literacy. However, it is suggested to make a further evaluation before making decision, to figure out whether the problem on the students, teachers or material. In addition, the data evaluation will integrate individual students and institutional variable that can impact the student academic achievement.
           

References:
The Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (ACSIP). Retrieved from http://
            Acsip.state.ar.us/cgi-bin/index.cgi?rm=report_acsip
The National for Research on Measurement and Evaluation Systems (NORMES).
Summary.php